My GTD Year Zero With One Big Text File

GTD apps are all the rage with smartphone and tablet owners everywhere; but do you really need to spend money on a bit of software laden with bells and whistles that you’ll never use? When tools like Omnifocus cost upwards of £20, isn’t there a better (and cheaper) way to get things done?

20130524-072943.jpg

In the mid-noughties, the “One Big Text File” meme whipped round the world’s tech-savvy GTD geeks. The premise was rather than bow to the conventions of someone else’s productivity app, you could manage your entire life inside one .txt file, formatted according to your own rules. Unsurprisingly, the idea took off.

Pioneered by Lifehacker editor Gina Trapani, the concept of getting things done with one of the oldest digital document formats became hugely popular. For me, it makes total sense.

As I mentioned in an earlier post, I’m easily distracted. My ADHD mindset means I’m always chasing “the next big thing”; in productivity apps, as much as in new music.

Since I first made the leap to iPhone four years ago, I must’ve spent hundreds of pounds on apps for getting things done. From Toodledo to Evernote, Wunderlist to Clear, I’ve downloaded them all; hacking the settings on each to try and get the perfect workflow. I’ve even tried doing it with GMail (it didn’t last long).

Within a couple of months I’m usually bored. Sick of being tied to the rules of someone else’s program, I’m soon on the lookout for something else that more closely fits my vision of David Allen’s concept.

What sets GTD apart from other productivity methods, though, is its simplicity. And what simpler way to manage it than an old-fashioned text file? They’ve existed since the dawn of the computer age and don’t look like going anywhere any time soon.

When Simplenote has long since bitten the dust and your Office 2007 documents are un-openable museum pieces, text will still be doing the business for geeks and hackers everywhere.

So, a couple of months ago I decided to ditch my technological crutches, delete all the productivity apps from my phone and do everything in a file called gtd.txt. I’ll be the first to admit it was a challenge, but now I’ve got my system ironed out I’ve become more productive than ever.

Rather than wasting time tagging, starring and colour-coding my todos in a fancy application, I’m spending more actually doing them; which is the whole point, surely?

Check out these articles on how to organise your life inside one big text file:

Living in Text Files

Creative Habits: Capturing Ideas in a Big Text File

A Plain Text Personal Organiser

Todo.txt in Action

Why I Use Todo.txt

How do you use technology to get things done? Could you make the leap to text?

Ten Productivity Hacks From A Procrastinating Music Journo

A firm fan of David Allen’s Getting Things Done, I’ve been applying his productivity method to my personal and professional projects for the last five years or so. Here’s how I’ve hacked it to fit my own life.

20130502-072026.jpg

I’m a unashamed procrastinator. When I was a student, I’d do anything other than write an essay. I’d work out in my head the absolute minimum amount of time I’d need for each piece of work and I’d never kick it off before that clock started ticking. It didn’t do my results much harm and it set me up nicely for the frenetic, deadline-driven pace of my future working life. It was stressful, though.

The problem is I’m easily distracted. Diagnosed with attention defecit problems as I child, it’s something I’ve never really grown out of. If my life isn’t planned out meticulously, I’ll just run headlong into the next big thing; regardless of whether it’s the most important. I live in “the now”, which is all well and good if you’re as Zen as Steven Seagal, but when you’re trying to manage twenty-plus personal and professional projects it’s hard work.

I’ve tried all sorts of productivity methods, most of which I’ve quickly left behind; but David Allen’s Getting Things Done was an epiphany. The perfect system for my ADHD mindset, it’s allowed me to structure my to do list and have a mind like water to be filled up with important stuff; like music, movies and whether Newcastle United are going to survive in The Premier League.

I’m a creative, though, so there’s no way I’d follow a system straight out of a book; where’s the fun in that? Part of the genius of GTD is that it can be easily hacked to suit your personality and still give the same great results. Don’t believe me? Here’s how I’ve adapted it to suit my style. Trust me, it works.

Plan the day

Didn’t someone once say that those who fail to plan are planning to fail? If they didn’t, they should have. Without a framework to structure my day around I’ll soon get dragged into pointless busy-work, social media and wasting hours on the latest big buzz iOS game that’s found its way onto my phone. Taking a cue from the idea of time blocking, I slice my day into fifteen minute chunks and schedule slots for my Most Important Tasks, Next Actions, research, social media and general downtime.

Time blocking isn’t for everyone, but having a rigid structure to my day (and setting reminders to go off when each new block kicks in) stops me getting bogged down with less important tasks that won’t push my projects forward. I’m a morning person and tend to do my best work in the early hours, so by blocking out some of that time for writing I know I’ll create something worthwhile on a daily basis.

Have some MITs (and do these first)

The best GTD hack I’ve ever come across is Leo Babauta’s Zen To Done. By marrying a bold approach to achieving goals with David Allen’s widget-driven productivity system, Babauta’s approach is thing of beauty; I urge you to read it (if you haven’t done already). The key concept that I’ve taken away is the idea of choosing your three daily MITs (Most Important Tasks) and making sure you get these done first. If you’ve moved three projects forward then it’s been a successful day, whatever happens.

I schedule thirty to forty-five minutes in the morning that I dedicate to my MITs (which I choose the night before). There’s no system I use to identify what’s important other than how I’m feeling, but I try to make sure my MITs are creative ones linked to the creative projects I’m working on. For example, today’s have been to finish writing this blog, review my latest non-fiction book proposal and brainstorm some plots for a short story.

Schedule time for email and social media

I’m a Media & Cultural Studies graduate so it’ll come as no surprise that I absolutely love social media. I’ve had a Twitter account since 2008 and have sent upwards of 10,000 tweets to my nearly 2,000 followers. It’s helped me win writing gigs, connect with people I want to interview and given me tons of inspiration for articles, blog posts and features. On the downside, it’s also been a huge drain on my productivity with all the wasted hours spent trying to stay afloat amid the tsunami of information.

In true rock ‘n’ roll style, I used to be a smoker; I’d think nothing of puffing my way through ten or twenty Marlboro Lights a day. It was the perfect cure for boredom. When I quit, my phone (and later the social media apps I loaded it with) filled that void; and it’s just as addictive. By scheduling time in my calendar for social networking and answering emails, I’ve managed to curb their drain on my time and dedicate more to my important tasks.

Keep tasks to fifteen minutes

David Allen describes tasks as single actions; anything else is a project. When I’m adding actions to my to do list, the first thing I ask myself is how long will it take? If I think it’ll take fifteen minutes or less then it’ll go on there; any longer and I’ll try and break it down again. By limiting next actions to things that will take quarter of an hour at most, I can easily fit them into my daily plan.

A good example is this post. Writing it is a project that I’ve broken down into easily actionable widgets like “brainstorm outline”, “draft intro”, “draft first two sections”; it means I don’t find myself overwhelmed with tasks that are going to take a huge amount of effort. By keeping them short and manageable I’m more likely to get things done.

Put everything in my calendar

Google Calendar is by far my favourite project management tool. Everything that has a deadline or needs to be actioned on a specific day goes on there. I check it religiously every morning so I’m always on top of what I need to get done. Anything that’s time-specific, however trivial, is on my calendar so I know I’m not missing anything.

I also include the time blocks I’ve scheduled for MITs, social media, reading the news and other repetitive tasks so I can easily visualise each day. By setting SMS reminders to message me when each time block starts, I’m no longer in danger of running over and wasting the day.

Have as few inboxes as possible

When I first started to apply David Allen’s methodology to my increasingly hectic personal and professional life, I was paralysed by the sheer volume of things that landed in my inboxes. It felt like most of my time was spent processing rather than doing; I was adding tasks to longer and longer lists that I never found the time to work through.

Nowadays, I keep my processing time short by having as few inboxes as I can get away with. I’ve got four in total; Drafts on my iPhone and iPad which serves as my digital notebook, my Gmail inbox, an in-tray next to my computer for letters, bills and other physical things that need actioning, and a Moleskine notebook for scribbling down tasks and ideas as they pop into my head.

Do a mini-review every day and a full review at the end of the week

To keep on top of my inboxes, I empty them daily. I’ve got half an hour sheduled in my calendar that I spend getting each inbox down to zero. I also review my day, ticking off MITs and other actions I’ve managed to complete. I then go through my project lists and identify why needs to happen next to move each one forward. On a good day it takes half an hour, at most.

Taking my cue from Tim Ferriss’s Four Hour Workweek, I have the next three actions for each project planned out in advance and try to complete at least one a day. I don’t rigorously monitor my goals, but I do have a mission statement that describes the kind of creative life I want to live and I make sure my projects align with that. By reviewing them daily, I know immediately if I’m going off course.

Write stuff down

One of the most important GTD lessons I’ve learned is to write everything down. I used to be unbelievably scatterbrained; so much so I was regularly berated by my own mother for my inability to remember anything. Nowadays, it’s all in a to do list. I’m confident enough in my system that I no longer need to worry about keeping everything important in my head.

Writing down (or typing, really) all the thoughts, ideas and actions I have as they pop into my head has allowed me to free my mind to focus on what’s important right now. Whether that’s working through my to do list, talking to my parents or chilling out in front of a movie with my girlfriend, I’ve learned to concentrate entirely on the moment without thinking about what I ought to be doing later.

Check in with myself every hour so I don’t go off track

Mindfulness is one of the biggest buzzwords in business right now. From world leaders and CEOs down to ordinary office workers, everyone is being encouraged to be mindful of what’s going on around them. Human beings have a habit of focusing on the past and the future and forgetting the present; by checking in with myself for a couple of minutes each hour, I can keep myself firmly on track.

By checking in, I mean reviewing the last hour; making sure what I’ve done was worthwhile, helped push my projects forward and wasn’t the kind of busywork that serves no long-term purpose. To make sure I’m still in “the now”, I’ll make time to consciously examine what I’m doing and why it’s worthwhile.

Review the day and highlight my successes and challenges

There’s no point spending all this time developing a daily productivity ritual if you don’t take the time to make sure it works. At the end of each day, I’ll review what I got done, what my successes and challenges were and what I need to do better tomorrow. By revisiting the day, I often find I’ve achieved more than I first thought, which puts me in a great frame of mind for tomorrow.

By getting my daily review done before I settle down to spend some quality leisure time with my girlfriend I can put the day to bed, happy in the knowledge I don’t have to think about anything until the morning. It means I’m always fully focused on enjoying the time I have in the evening, with my iPhone close to hand to quickly jot down anything that finds its way into my head.

What do you think? What hacks have you developed to help you get things done?

Tipping Point: Royal Blood

My latest Tipping Point article is on Brighton-based hard-rockers Royal Blood. Taking their cue from noughties stalwarts The White Stripes and Death From Above 1979, the incandescent two-piece deliver explosive proto-metal that Page and Plant would be proud of.

resized_imagejpeg

Ten years ago this month The White Stripes unleashed their fourth album, Elephant. The mega-selling follow-up to their break-out hit White Blood Cells, it established the lo-fi rockers as one of the noughties’ most influential bands and inspired a wave of copyists to ditch sparkly production in favour of gritty, upfront blues-rock.

A decade on and The White Stripes influence can still be felt. In Brighton, hard-rocking duo Royal Blood have embraced Jack and Meg’s blueprint whole-heartedly with their fuzz-heavy odes to the blues pioneers of the thirties. Recent track “Figure It Out” is Robert Johnson re-imagined for the Facebook generation. An explosively heavy Zeppelin-esque stomper, it’s at the crossroads between the proto-metal of AC/DC and Black Sabbath and the electronic space-rock of Death From Above 1979.

Blurring the lines between the south coast of England and the Mississippi delta, Royal Blood are nothing short of incandescent. Their Soundcloud page hosts one song, but it’s enough. As exciting as Jack White’s era-defining “Seven Nation Army”, “Figure It Out” is contemporary rock ‘n’ roll at its most thrilling. It won’t be long before Royal Blood have their hands on The Black Keys‘ crown.

First published at The Tipping Point

Should You Merge Your Personal And Professional Brands?

Personal branding is a buzz phrase for the Internet Age. How can we use the online tools at our disposal to create a self-image that defines not only who we are, but who we want to be? When we’re working out how to present ourselves in the digital world, how much crossover should there be between our personal and professional lives?

spidersfrommars

I’m fiercely passionate about music. It helps define who I am. Ever since I started listening to my parents’ Beatles, Bowie and Small Faces records as a child I’ve been hooked. I’ve even turned it into a career of sorts, writing about emerging artists for a variety of high profile publications including Artrocker, Dazed & Confused, NME, Paste and R2 (among others). I also have a day job.

A business analyst in the Utilities industry, I love going to work every day. Bringing my rock ‘n’ roll ideals to what is actually a hugely exciting sector, I’ve carved out a niche as an articulate numbers man with a talent for making dull business documents sound interesting. For some reason, though, I’ve always kept my personal and professional personas separate.

In a recent interview for a new job, my interviewer (and friend) pointed out that I should have thought about using my writing experience as an answer for at least one of the questions. It’s my USP, after all. On my professional CV, it’s limited to two words in the “interests” section, which doesn’t do justice to the hours I’ve spent chasing bands for interviews, pitching articles, hanging out at gigs, appearing on radio shows and all the other music-related stuff I’ve done over the years.

I got the job, but his comments set me thinking; how can you merge disparate personal and professional brands? I’ve worked hard to cultivate both, but sometimes it feels like I’m two different people; how can I fuse those things together? Is your personal brand about defining your niche, or is it about bringing all your niches together?

I Wanna Be Your Dog: Your Uniqueness Is Your Personal Brand

It feels like I’ve been missing a trick when it comes to defining my personal brand. By keeping both the personal and the professional separate, I’ve done nothing to set myself apart from every other music journalist or business analyst trying to make a living in what are very different yet equally cutthroat industries. But a music writer who understands analytics, forecasting and mathematical modelling? You don’t meet them every day.

The skills I’ve learnt as a music journalist, from dealing with difficult interviewees to managing ever-changing deadlines, have done much to enhance my ability to be successful in my professional role. The same can be said for bringing my business knowledge to bear on my writing. Experience of analysing large data sets, producing forecasts and designing statistical models opens up a whole new set of journalistic opportunities.

The music industry is in flux; what used to be a business based on balance sheets is now all about the ones and zeroes. Writers who understand numbers are much better placed to comment on the impact of digital downloads, streaming and other technological shifts in the production and consumption of music. Maybe I’ve talked myself into a new niche right there.

Spread Your Love: Having A Single Niche Limits Your Development

When I first started blogging in the mid-noughties, I bought into the perceived wisdom that successful bloggers have a neatly defined niche. There are music bloggers, lifestyle bloggers, health & fitness bloggers, financial bloggers, bloggers in every conceivable field. Define your subject, the experts say; that’s what wins you readers.

But what if I have more than one interest? Yes, music writing is a huge part of who I am, but by focusing purely on that niche in the past, have I limited myself as a writer and blogger? In my offline life I have a career, hobbies and other interests. Shouldn’t they also play a part in my online brand? Do I really need a different URL for every subject I want to write about?

Experience is what helps us develop into well-rounded individuals. Writers who focus on one subject are limiting themselves. Magazines can tackle the same topic in depth in every issue, but personal branding is about spreading the message about who you are as an individual. I’m an analyst and writer who loves new music, horror movies, football, technology, video games and comic books; what’s wrong with embracing all of that?

I Am The Resurrection: If It Isn’t Working, Don’t Be Afraid To Revive Your Brand

I’ve been a musician, a music industry buyer, a barman, an advertising executive and plenty of other things in between. I even worked in a potato-packing factory once (don’t ask). I didn’t start writing professionally until my mid-twenties and have only been an analyst for the last five years. I’ve also started (and abandoned) three Masters degrees. Life is about learning; you need to try a few hats before you find one that fits.

As your life moves on, don’t be afraid to rebrand yourself. The man I am in my mid-thirties is pretty different to the one who left university with wide-eyed dreams of stardom in the early noughties. Your personal brand isn’t set in stone. Like your CV, it should grow with the life experiences that enhance you as a human being. What you do isn’t anywhere near as important as who you are.

Personal branding is about creating an online persona that reflects your core values in a compelling way. It’s not all about your successes. Everyone wins and loses; embrace your individuality and let people see you for the person you’ve become. No one’s got time to live up to a false image they’ve created, after all.

What do you think? Do you need to stick to a niche for your personal brand or should you embrace all aspects of your personality?

Five Mistakes Unsigned Bands Make

Most unsigned bands long for rock ‘n’ roll domination. Why would you get up onstage if you didn’t dream of huge recording advances, sellout stadium gigs and supermodel girlfriends. What few realise, though, is that the mistakes they make in their early days can scupper their chances of success for good. Here’s how to make sure it doesn’t happen to you.

The+Pretty+Things

Back in the eighties, there was a myth that working class kids had four career choices; the dole, drug dealing, football or music. Even now, becoming a rock star is the ultimate goal for young people up and down the country who don’t have the sporting talent to kick a ball into an onion bag. Oasis chief Noel Gallagher described it perfectly on his band’s debut; “In my mind my dreams are real.” For many, that’s as close as they ever get.

But how do you transform rock ‘n’ roll vision into tangible success? Surely, making it in music is about far more than just being in the right place at the right time? How can you improve your chances of turning bedroom posturing into a viable career? Music is an industry where dreams become reality; what can you do to make sure those dreams are yours?

For a lot of musicians, the mistakes they make at the onset can scupper them for good. It’s all too easy to rush in with your eyes closed, teaming up with friends to form a band before you’ve even thought about where it’s going. For some, it works; but it’s more luck than judgement. Music, after all, is still a multi-billion dollar industry. Jump in without any forethought and you’ll sink like a stone.

Plenty of bands have crashed and burned before you. For every Rolling Stones there’s a Pretty Things, unknown legends of rock ‘n’ roll that, for one reason or another, never scaled the heights of their rivals. Do you want to follow suit and become a footnote in the annals of pop history? Here are some of the biggest mistakes unsigned bands make so you can avoid them.

Who Are You?: Picking The Wrong Name For Your Band

So, what’s in a name? Does it really matter what moniker you choose? Led Zeppelin famously settled on theirs after The Who‘s drummer Keith Moon quipped that they’d go down like one. Some of the finest bands of all time have had some of the worst names imaginable (I’m looking at you, Arctic Monkeys).

Nowadays, though, choosing the name for your band is a lot more important than you’d first think. When many people discover new music online, if you haven’t got a name that’s easily Googled then you’re missing a trick from the start. Most bands make the mistake of picking the first name that pops into their heads; but choose a good one and you can set your career on the right path from the start.

No Fun: Taking Yourselves Too Seriously

Yes, playing live can be fun; but take it too far and look like you’re joking around and you’ll alienate any serious music industry types who might be interested. The Beatles famously used to eat, drink and generally mess around onstage; but as John Lennon once said, it reached the point where they either became successful or continued to eat chicken in front of their audience.

To be successful in music you need to iron out the amateurish edges as soon as you can. When you’re rehearsing, practice with your live show in mind. From how your frontman interacts with the audience, to how your lead guitarist holds his axe; your stage persona is an important part of your image. Don’t neglect it.

Learning The Game: Not Taking Yourselves Seriously Enough

There’s a fine line between taking your music seriously and being so serious that it alienates your potential fanbase. No one wants to see a band so obsessed with their career and the choreography of their shows that they’ve forgotten to have fun. There are few better feelings than playing in front of an audience who are getting off on your music; never forget that.

Live music is about entertainment. Always remember that the whole purpose of your gigs is for those who come to see you to have a good time. Yes, you need to take it seriously. People have paid good money to get in the door; you need them to think it was worth it. But never let your seriousness get in the way of your interaction with the audience.

Hey Mr Songwriter: Not Spending Enough Time On The Music

The first batch of songs you write as a band will be rubbish, trust me. Have you ever heard the first Oasis demos? They sound like a subpar Stone Roses without the melody. It’d be a few years before Noel Gallagher would have the songs to set the world alight with Definitely Maybe.

Too many bands fail to edit their music, choosing to play and record just about everything they ever write. It’s a mistake. You can’t pen a hit every time; you’re better off playing a twenty minute set of your best songs than an hour packed with filler. When you’re writing, never settle for good enough; strive for perfection. But don’t expect to achieve it.

Hungry Like The Wolf: Not Chasing Opportunities For Success

Real life isn’t like The Commitments. A&R men won’t walk into your next pub gig and slap a contract down on the bar. Making it in music means a lot of hard work. You need to be chasing every opportunity you can, not just waiting for them to step into your path. If you’re not willing to hustle to get your music heard, chances are it won’t be.

There’s a misconception that as long as you’ve got great songs you’ll get somewhere eventually. It’s a lie. If it was that simple, why are there so many amazing bands that never went anywhere? If you don’t believe me, just listen to the legendary Nuggets compilation. A career in music takes blood, sweat and tears. If you haven’t got the bottle for it, do something else instead.

What do you think? What other mistakes do bands make at the start of their careers?

Why Bands Need To Think Twice Before Selling Out

Selling out has long been a dirty phrase in rock ‘n’ roll. But is it still relevant? As the commodification of music continues to gather pace in the digital age, do bands still need to be wary of selling their soul for some of the advertising industry’s gold?

thewho

In the late sixties, London Mod legends The Who released The Who Sell Out, a tongue-in-cheek joke about the commodification of music and the ease with which artists would sell their songs for a bite of the advertisers’ cherry. More than forty years on, selling out has become the norm as bands slide seamlessly from peddling renegade cool to flogging everything from phones to fizzy drinks. Even The Who‘s chief songwriter, Pete Townshend has done it, selling some of his most famous teen anthems for commercials and TV themes; not so much “hope I die before I get old” as “hope I live long enough to cash that cheque from CSI”.

But what does selling out mean for today’s musicians? When everyone’s at it, is it even something that warrants debate? Has popular music become so ingrained in the mainstream that the concept of the rock musician as outsider is obsolete? How would Joe Strummer cope in the digital age when everybody’s trying to sell something? Since 1987, when Nike used The Beatles‘ “Revolution” to inject their trainers with a bit of anti-establishment swagger, brands have courted musicians to help make their products seem more hip. In most cases, though, it’s worked the other way. Rather than injecting cool into commodity, the Faustian pact between big business and rock ‘n’ roll has damaged the reputation of more than a few acts.

As the industry scrabbles for ways to stay profitable in the wake of the digital revolution, bands are jumping into bed with brand sponsors more readily than ever. Former Beatle Paul McCartney, lost every shred of cool he had left when he teamed up with global coffee giants Starbucks to release an album. When the icons of the sixties counterculture are having a new kind of love in with “the man” what hope is there for everyone else? When the car manufacturers call, how are you going to turn them down? Here’s why you should think twice before selling your soul to a company.

They Say You Want A Revolution: Advertising Won’t Ever Make You Cool

The music business is an industry built on myth. From Elvis Presley‘s revolutionary gyrations, to Nirvana‘s slacker prophecies and beyond, whole careers have been turned into quasi-religious legends by an industry eager to inject music with an importance far beyond what can be expected from few songs on a disc. Iconic stars like John Lennon, Jimi Hendrix and Kurt Cobain have attained prophet-like status; religious figures for a secular world.

It’s this myth that big business wants to buy into. By aligning their products with popular culture trailblazers, they’re desperately hoping some of the magic will rub off. Apart from the likes of Steve Jobs and Henry Ford, there aren’t many business innovators who can attain rockstar status on their own, after all.

The problem for artists is that selling their soul to an advertising campaign will never make them cool. Before the counter-cultural revolution, the concept of selling out didn’t exist. But once musicians began to inject their songs with politics, they became spokesmen and women for a generation desperate to disassociate themselves with the mainstream; advertising was out the question.

It’s that notion that still permeates pop culture. As the new Internet-savvy generation begins to take over, the concept of the sell out may die; but right now bands need to be careful. The typical 16-to-34-year-old has been exposed to advertising since birth. They can see through it in seconds; send out the wrong message and you’ll alienate them in an instant.

Live Forever: Some Things Are More Important Than Making Money

When your music career’s dead and buried, how do you want to be remembered? For the song you sold to a Samsung ad or for the cutting-edge albums you released? For many artists who jump aboard the advertising gravy train, it becomes the central theme of their careers. Peter, Bjorn & John gave us some thrilling post-millennial folk-pop; but what are they known for? The song on the Homebase ad.

Yes, you might earn a decent wedge from licensing your music for adverts; but is it worth sacrificing your band’s history? Music is a commodity, but for diehard fans it’s imbued with significance. Sell a song that’s been embraced by your audience as a huge part of their lives and you’re selling their dreams. Much like the millennial cash cow of the reunion, jumping into bed with advertisers is akin to prostituting your rock ‘n’ roll soul.

Musicians can’t underestimate the importance their music can have in other people’s lives. From weddings to funerals, first kisses to first night’s out; our favourite songs are the soundtrack to our personal stories. With the arrival of the digital age, they’ve become even more personal, as we grab tracks from across the whole recorded history of popular music. Are you willing to risk your band’s place in those stories for the sake of a few extra dollars or pounds?

Most young musicians dream of the kind of rock ‘n’ roll success that turned bands like Led Zeppelin into megastars. It’s stories of private jets, groupies and wanton excess that make rock ‘n’ roll careers seem so thrilling; not the ins and outs of the advertising deals. Music, after all, is about far more than numbers on a balance sheet.

What do you think? Is selling out something every band needs to think carefully about?

Why Your Band Needs To Have Something To Say

If you’ve got any ambition as a musician, one thing you’ll have to get to grips with is talking to the press. Unlike the pre-Internet days where you had to be vaguely successful (or at least riding a tsunami-sized wave of hype) to get in the NME or Rolling Stone, nowadays you can find yourself being interviewed before you’ve even set foot outside your practice room. Here’s how to make sure you’ve got something to say that’s worth writing about.

John-Lennon-500x384

The music press; friend and enemy in equal measure of anyone who’s ever tried to make a career out of playing in a band. At best it can turn artists into legends, creating myths as readily as Homer’s Iliad. At worse, it can kill careers stone dead with one misjudged quote emblazoned across a front cover in a bid to shift more copies.

For musicians, the relationship with music journalists has always been a difficult one; more akin to the Molotov treaty between Hitler and Stalin than the special relationship love-in that’s between Britain and the United States. Journalists want great quotes to build great articles around in a bid to further their Hunter S. Thompson-sized ambitions. Musicians want exposure, but they don’t want to rock the boat with ill-guarded comments that offend their fanbase. It didn’t do Brian Harvey any good, after all.

In the mid-sixties, John Lennon felt the wrath of Middle America when a flippant remark to a British writer about The Beatles being bigger than Jesus was blown up out of all proportion. An off-the-cuff statement that was barely reported in the UK, it transformed the band from harmless mop-tops to distrusted anti-establishment figureheads in the US, souring their relationship with a whole swathe of their fanbase for good.

But, for all the inherent dangers of speaking freely to the press, you’ve got to say something. No one wants a band without an opinion. While the world’s expectations of musicians are changing in the Internet age, there’s still a perception that artists should be thought leaders. No one wants to read interviews that sound like a Premier League post-match press conference.

Here are three ways to ensure that when you do find yourself being interviewed by a would-be Lester Bangs you’ve got something to ignite their copy and give their audience something worth reading.

Immigrant Song: Write Your Own Myths and Make Sure They’re Quotable

One misconception about music magazine interviews is that that expect you to be truthful. In reality, no one cares that your band formed in your sixth form common room like every other band out there. Music fans want myths and legends to elevate their favourite artists to iconic status. The last thing they want is to find out your lives are just as ordinary as theirs.

Lennon famously claimed that The Beatles moniker was delivered to him by a man atop a flaming pie. Nonsens, obviously, but it’s a story ingrained in the folklore of England’s most famous musical export. Create your own legends; don’t wait for someone else to do it for you.

(Song For My) Sugarspun Sister: Invent Your Own Musical Story

The music press has long been obsessed with the meanings behind the songs. Ever since Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, Dark Side Of The Moon and the like elevated popular music from throwaway chart fodder to the realm of high art, writers and audiences have fallen in love with the music creation process as much as the music itself.

Browse through the music section of any half-decent bookshop and you’ll be greeted with title after title analysing the stories behind your favourite albums. If you ever want your music to be argued over in print then there better be a good story behind it. Don’t wait for a savvy interviewer to bring it to the fore, though, write it yourself.

The Last Gang In Town: Define Your Philosophy and Make Sure It Shines Through

The Clash are one of the most influential bands to emerge from the UK. Fusing socialist ideals, Joe Strummer‘s everyman squatter mentality and a desire to write about something deeper than girls and good times with The Sex Pistols‘ punk-rock blueprint, they continue to define the rules of British guitar music two decades after their demise. Far more than just a band, for their fans The Clash embody an anti-authoritarian philosophy still at the heart of youth culture.

As important as their songwriting, it was this philosophy that elevated The Clash to iconic status. Peppered with scattergun references to The Spanish Civil War, Marxist trailblazers, human rights and the power of the people, their interviews were as revolutionary, at times, as the writings of some of history’s most influential political activists. They understood that being in a hugely successful band gave them the perfect platform to articulate their views in far more than music; and they did so with gusto. You should too.

What do you think? How important is it for bands to make sure they’ve got something worth saying?

A Musicians’ Guide To Google Plus

An exciting new player in the social media game, Google+ has attracted zealots and doubters in equal measure during its brief existence. Firmly embedded into Google’s vision of the future, one thing’s for sure, though; it’s here to stay. A service that offers bands and artists unique new ways to promote their music, it already looks destined to become an essential element of their online marketing mix.

satriani

If the Internet is The Wild West of the digital age, then Google+ is its newest frontier town; a tight-knit community of online explorers eager to push the boundaries of what’s achievable with social media. While the masses flock to Facebook and Twitter, the early adopters of Google+ are a different breed; people with the vision to realise that social is at the heart of the Internet’s future.

But why should musicians be interested? At first glance, Google+ looks like a playground for the kind of tech geeks who hung out in online chat rooms years before their school bullies knew how to log on. But that’s part of its allure; Google+ is a brave new world whose rules are yet to be fully defined. For musicians, it offers the opportunity to be a trailblazer; become a Google+ ninja before your contemporaries and they’ll always be playing catch up.

Pessimistic news stories that have already branded Google+ a failure are wide of the mark. I’ve been using it on an almost daily basis for several months and I’m beginning to build up a strong network of like-minded followers. Google+ offers opportunities for in-depth interactions that just aren’t possible amid the noise on Twitter and Facebook; here’s how you can make the most of it.

Why bother with Google+, anyway?

The rules are yet to be defined, so you can make it your own

Google+ is a youthful social network. While both Twitter and Facebook have been building their user bases for years, Google+ is only just beginning to make the transition from ghost town to bustling new frontier. Because its so early in its existence, though, its rules and etiquette still haven’t been defined. The “tried and tested” methods for marketing music on social media are yet to be ingrained into Google+. Bands who are early adopters have free reign to promote their music any way they see fit. Experimentation, it seems, is the name of the game.

Google+ users are more willing to engage in conversation

If Facebook is like hanging out in a bar with your mates, bragging about holidays and how great your kids are, and Twitter‘s like standing on your town’s busiest street shouting about what you had for breakfast at total strangers, then Google+ is like one of those networking events where like-minded creatives get together to wax lyrical about the future. Its users are far more willing to engage in deep conversation with people they don’t know about subjects that inspire them.

The deep integration with Google Search means its far more than just another social network

Treating Google+ like any other social network is missing the point entirely. It’s the future of search and is central to the company’s vision. Eventually, it’ll be embedded into everything we do online, using interactions to determine page rank instead of the current algorithms. If you want your music to compete for attention online, then the sooner you embrace Google‘s new approach the better.

What are the benefits of having a Google+ presence?

You can steal a march on your contemporaries

Who wants to be a follower, anyway? No one remembers the bandwagon jumpers, it’s the visionaries who light the touch-paper for musical revolutions who stand the test of time. The same can be said for bands who adopt social media. Google+ hasn’t reached its tipping point yet, where the man in the street thinks he ought to be on there. When it does, though, if you’ve got a well-built presence then you’ll be miles ahead of your contemporaries.

There’s less competition for attention so you’re far more likely to encourage engagement

On Facebook and Twitter the world is fighting for followers. You’re up against everyone from Gaga and Bieber to the band in the practice room next door in the battle to be noticed. Don’t create compelling content on a daily basis and you’ll soon be lost in the noise. On Google+, though, you’ve got an opportunity to carve out your own niche without having to fight for it.

You can create deep relationships with your most fervent supporters

Google+ isn’t limited to 140 characters or the rules of short sound bites; it’s a deep social network that, at times, feels more like a blog. Long posts of several hundred words aren’t frowned upon, and let users create meaningful conversations around the topics that interest them. Far more than a vehicle for self-promotion, it allows Plussers (can we call them that?) ways to create deep online relationships that are far more rewarding than those on other networks.

How can musicians get the most out of Google+?

Use Hangouts to build your online audience

Get involved in Google+ communities

Share and comment on other people’s content

What are the do’s and don’t's for musicians on Google+?

Don’t bombard your followers with links to your music

Do encourage conversation and interaction

Don’t worry about how many people follow you

Do link Google+ to your blog

Don’t just rehash what you’re posting on Twitter and Facebook

Do utilise the smart way Google+ deals with different types of media

What do you think? Is Google+ destined to become an essential element of the modern musician’s marketing strategy?

Three Bands Who Turned Infighting Into Marketing Gold

Artistic differences have led to the demise of some of rock’s greatest bands. From The Beatles to The Smiths, fractured relationships have brought many an outfit to a grinding halt. For others, though, they’ve led to even greater boughts of creativity. Here are three bands that turned their rancorous personal relationships into marketing gold.

thetroggs

The pressure of being in a band brings out the worst in some musicians. Spending every waking hour in each other’s company, there are plenty of opportunities for band members to rub each other up the wrong way. From the singer’s tour bus habits, to the way the guitarist rocks up late for every soundcheck, the smallest annoyances can push your band to breaking point.

Fistfights, arguments and an inability to see each other’s point of view have led to the demise of some of the all-time greats. For some bands, though, it’s been an intrinsic part of what defines them; the explosive element that’s as important to their success as the quality of their music.

If you want to be a great band, you’ve got to push boundaries. And that doesn’t always mean pushing in the same direction. Bands like The Hollies and The Beach Boys fell apart as their founders found themselves heading down opposing creative paths. But for others, their differences were the fuel that fired their success.

Here are three bands who made infighting an essential element of their brand:

Wild Thing: The Troggs

When Troggs frontman Reg Presley died a few weeks ago, the obituaries were full of praise for the band’s contribution to sixties pop. Their iconic number one single “Wild Thing” was a raw blast of incandescent garage-rock that set down the blueprint for punk a full decade before The Sex Pistols. Described by Jimi Hendrix as the “national anthem” when he covered it in spectacular style at The Monterey Pop Festival in 1967, it remains one of the defining tracks of the era.

What defines The Troggs‘ career, though, isn’t their hit singles, it’s the infamous Troggs Tapes. A recording of the band struggling to make progress in the studio, it’s an expletive-strewn account of a group on the brink of self-destruction. One of the most enduring pieces of rock ‘n’ roll mythology, it was allegedly the inspiration for Spinal Tap and cemented The Troggs‘ legend.

Without The Troggs Tapes, it’s likely that Reg Presley and co. would be regarded as little more than Swinging Sixties also-rans; famous for being the band that gave Wet Wet Wet their nauseating smash “Love Is All Around”. With a flurry of f-bombs, though, they managed to rise far above their handful of chart hits. As famous simply for swearing as The Beatles are for redefining popular culture, The Troggs are bona fide rock ‘n’ roll legends.

My Big Mouth: Oasis

There aren’t many bands that could have a chart hit with a gin-fuelled argument. In the mid-nineties, though, Mancunian Britpop legend Oasis weren’t just any band. Beginning as a run-of-the-mill music press interview, the recording that became known as Wibbling Rivalry soon degenerated into an incoherent rant between warring brothers Noel and Liam Gallagher.

Centering on an infamous episode early in the band’s career when Liam Gallagher was thrown off a ferry to Amsterdam, it was a battle for the very soul of rock ‘n’ roll that made The Troggs Tapes look like a minor disagreement. Liam Gallagher has cultivated his own a legend by saying what he thinks, and Wibbling Rivalry found him in full flow.

Rather than losing them fans, Wibbling Rivalry helped cement Oasis‘ burgeoning legend as the most exciting band in Britain. The unhinged relationship between the Gallagher brothers was the rocket fuel behind the band’s meteoric rise. Unbelievably, they managed to hold things together for more than a decade and a half, before a guitar-destroying fallout backstage finally soured their relationship for good.

You Really Got Me: The Kinks

Another band propelled by brotherly hate, The Kinks‘ impossibly catchy pop belied an undercurrent of explosive violence. Prone to bouts of onstage fisticuffs, it’s a miracle the band made any music at all; let alone some of the most iconic British pop songs ever released.

And it wasn’t just brothers Ray and Dave Davies kicking off. The rancor permeated the entire band. Onstage at a gig in Cardiff in the mid-sixties, a fight left guitarist Dave unconscious after being hit by drummer Mick Avory‘s hi-hat stand. Unbelievably, the band survived.

Alongside The Beatles, The Rolling Stones, The Who and The Small Faces, The Kinks are one of the most iconic bands of the sixties. With singles like “All Day And All Of The Night”, “Waterloo Sunset” and “Lola”, they transformed the way British musicians wrote songs, paving the way for The Jam, The Smiths, Blur and Arctic Monkeys. At their core, though, was the feeling that it could end any minute amid a spectacular flurry of punches.

What do you think? Can infighting and arguments help fire your band to success?

What Vampire Weekend Can Teach You About Launching An Album

Vampire Weekend’s third album Modern Vampires of the City is released in May via XL Records. If you’ve got even a passing interest in the Internet chatter around new music then you’ll already know its one of the most eagerly anticipated albums of the year. But how did the off-kilter New Yorkers milk every last drop of hyperbole out of their new album launch?

vampireweekend500

Vampire Weekend aren’t your run-of-the-mill indie outfit. Firmly rooted in the anti-industry slacker culture that gave rise to legendary anti-heroes like Pavement and Beck, they were never likely to do the expected when launching the follow-up to 2010′s global smash Contra. But how do you build a buzz without playing the industry game?

Inspired by Paul Simon‘s iconic 1987 album Graceland, Vampire Weekend‘s sophomore release was a sublime slice of dancefloor-friendly guitar-pop. Unsurprisingly, it turned its creators into one of the most talked-about bands on earth. The anithesis of The Strokes‘ too-cool-for-school hipster-punk, this was New York indie for the everyman; Buddy Holly to Casablancas and co.’s Elvis.

When Twitter started rumbling to rumours that the band were readying Contra‘s follow-up, it’s no surprise that plenty of music fans got a little bit excited. Countless stories, hoaxes and teasers abounded as the world waited for news. And what did Vampire Weekend do? They let it roll. Rather than follow the traditional route of self-promotion, they let the internet do it for them.

Here’s what Vampire Weekend can teach you about launching a new album in the digital age:

The Kids Don’t Stand A Chance: Set The Online Buzz Running

A few weeks ago, Vampire Weekend posted a cryptic message on their website and Tumblr page that simply said “MVOTC”. Written in tiny text at the bottom of a flash intro page on their website, it sent the internet into speculation overdrive. With little more than an image of some castaways and the message “LP3 complete”, suddenly the entire world knew the band was back.

But what did “MVOTC” mean? Was it linked to the album title? Or was it a reference to the Martha’s Vineyard area of Massachusets where the band recorded? Twitter thought it knew, as fans discussed wilder and wilder interpretations of the acronym via th #MVOTC hashtag.

What the subtle announcement did do was reveal that an album was on the way. Rather than a massive fanfare, the blink-and-you-missed-it announcement got the buzz building in spectacular fashion. Word of mouth, after all, is still one of the most powerful marketing tools. By being vague and semi-secretive, Vampire Weekend had the entire Internet talking about them.

I Think Ur a Contra: If You Get Punked, Roll With It

Desperate to be first with the scoop on the album, a host of blogs and websites were fooled into believing some artwork made by a student with a penchant for punking online media outlets was genuine. A Photoshopped image that referenced the band’s previous release was passed off as the real new album cover by online publications that maybe should have known better.

Vampire Weekend‘s response? Do nothing. While many bands would have felt pressured into revealing the real album, Vampire Weekend let it go; allowing the joke to become part of the story. You’d be fogiven for thinking that they’d set the whole thing up themselves.

Everyone enjoys a joke. There’s a reason they’re among the most-shared social media posts and emails. By letting the world laugh at a huge cock-up by the online music journalism industry, Vampire Weekend weren’t the but of the joke at all; they were its ringleaders.

I Stand Corrected: Let Someone Else Deliver The Big Reveal

After building the hype to near breaking point, you’d be forgiven for expecting Vampire Weekend to revert to music industry convention with “the big reveal”. Surely there’d be some kind of press conference or press release where all the questions about the album would be answered? Think again; the band, it seems, had other ideas.

This time there were no trumpets or fireworks. Rather than spectacularly throwing back the curtains on their cryptic teaser, the band officially announced the album via the classified ads section of The New York Times. By simply tweeting “NYT classifieds…” the album title and its release date were revealed to the world, no further PR necessary.

By utilising social media, the Internet and word of mouth, Vampire Weekend managed to launch their album with maximum visibility with minimum effort. They may have the advantage of being one of America’s finest indie bands, but they proved that in the digital age you don’t need shedloads of money to create a buzz.

What do you think? What else can independent artists learn from Vampire Weekend’s album launch?